charge a high price for the iPad OS Photolab to the faithful (us).bring a mediocre iPad OS Photolab to a quick launch.take programming resources away from Photolab to create an iPad OS Photolab.If DxO were a larger company, they should probably make the first two or three versions of Photolab iPad OS free to bring new punters into the fold (some would buy the desktop version after trying the iPad version) and only start charging when the iPad version is close to desktop equivalent. Photolab is a massive and powerful program and not easily replicated on iPad. My concern with the iPad version is that the first few iterations can only disappoint. Heat: the only time my iPad Pro gets warm is when charging. DxO is stuck reoptimising Photolab for ARM processors in any case, as Apple is moving laptops over to ARM as well (MacBook M1, Mac Mini M1). But let’s add some perspective here - Nvidia’s GTX 680 scores 8012, while the GTX 980 scores 15011.Īnything from the iPad Pro 3d generation and up or with an A12 chip or higher is an enormously powerful computing platform. Yes, the iPad is way behind on the Metal score but does keep up on CPU, which is mainly what Photolab uses. My Mac Pro 5,1 12 core with a Radeon VII (accelerated via OpenCore) scores =~ 5500 with Metal (graphics) score =~ 68000. Geekbench 5 CPU scores are =~ 4700 with a Metal (graphics) score of =~ 11800. I have an iPad 2018 12.9" (similar to the current one, this was the generation with the huge jump in CPU power with the A12X and then A12Z chip). Joanna, you are underestimating the power of the latest Apple ARM processors and how well they dissipate heat. If the CPU in a desktop gets that hot, what makes you think an iPad will be comfortable to hold in your hands?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |